Assistant Professor of Technical Communication, Illinois Institute of Technology
Google Prettify’s claim that it won’t interfere with embedded tags in code examples appears incorrect; if the code example is only HTML, Prettify will remove any embedded tags (like a strong tag used to highlight a code change). Adding non-HTML code to the sample allows the tags to remain, but the expected rendering of HTML code elements disappears, too.
Is a possible activity-theory based critique of WYSIWYG digital production that WYSIWYG takes what, at the code level, would be actions and moves them down, outside of a human agent, to the level of operations? And that making so many actions (e.g., bolding text) into operations shared across, say, a Web editor and a Word processor, clouds the entire idea of the activity of digital production?
I enjoy my Kinesis keyboards, especially because they are such conversation pieces.

The Kinesis Advantage: An abstract view.
New Media, Old(er) Media alert: why is there such a disconnect between the compelling election primary graphics on broadcast CNN, versus the paltry offerings on CNN.com?
I’m an assistant professor of technical communication at Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago, IL. I completed my PhD in rhetoric and composition at Purdue University in 2007.
This fall, I am teaching graduate seminars in Information Structure and Retrieval, and Open Source in Technical Communication.
On Twitter: @spinuzzi that actually does make me feel better.